Advertisement
BREAKING: Sullivan City Council defeats cold meds bill PDF Print E-mail
Tuesday, December 01 2009

SULLIVAN –The Sullivan City Council at its meeting Tuesday evening voted 4-2 against an ordinance that proposed makingWill Sites/Sullivan Journal over-the-counter pseudoephedrine-based cold and allergy medicines available by prescription only. Alderman Jarrett Dace (Ward III) and Alderman Dennis Watz (Ward III) voted for the ordinance. Alderman Michael Ryan (Ward I), Alderman Paul McCulloch (Ward II), Alderman Micheal Lohden (Ward II) and Alderman Tom Leasor (Ward I) voted against the ordinance.

The City Council spent about an hour discussing the bill, which would have required prescriptions for pseudoephedrine-based products to be written by a Missouri-licensed physician and filled by a Missouri-licensed pharmacist. Aldermen made their opinions known, as did two others who were present at the meeting. Sgt. Jason Grellner, a Franklin County narcotics officer who’s been pushing for the bill in several Missouri cities, spoke at the meeting, as did a Sullivan Wal-Mart pharmacist in favor of the bill.

Despite their pleas, Council members voted against the ordinance. Dace, who sponsored the bill, was disappointed with the outcome. “It’s not what I wanted, but I’m glad we have addressed this issue,” he said.

Aldermen Lohden and Leasor told the council their “No” votes were largely based on the views of their constituents who did not favor the ordinance. “I’ve gotten more feedback on this than any other issue – even the water and sewer rates,” Leasor said. “Most feel the ordinance would impose on them. The majority of people that I spoke with are adamantly opposed to it. They don’t want it. I only talked to one person who was in favor of it.”

Alderman Lohden echoed those sentiments. “It’s about what the people want,” he said. “Most of the people I talked to are against it. I’m voting against it because that’s the feeling of most of my constituents.”

Alderman McCulloch said even if Sullivan passed the ordinance, people would just go down the road to a place where a prescription isn’t required for pseudoephedrine-based cold medicines.

Alderman Dace said if Sullivan did adopt the ordinance, maybe other municipalities down the road would pass such a bill. Two cities in Franklin County - Washington and Union - recently passed ordinances requiring a prescription for pseudoephedrine-based cold medicines.

Aldermen against the ordinance also spoke about the infringement on individual rights, to which Dace replied: “I’m not trying to limit your rights – I’m trying to eliminate a problem.”

Watz, who also voted for the ordinance, said he feels the Council has a responsibility to fight crime and stop the production of methamphetamine. However, the Council ultimately voted against the ordinance.

Jaime Baranyai can be reached at 860-NEWS or by e-mail at This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

Comments
Add NewSearchRSS
jcemily@fidnet.com   | 72.172.215.xxx | 2009-12-01 22:10:46
Requiring a prescription puts a burden, both financial and time wasted, on innocent people in need of relief for allergies and colds. We already have to stop by the pharmacy, sign our name, and are limited to one box of whatever product we need. That should eliminate the buying of the amount needed for illegal manufacture of methamphetamine.
Mom038   | 67.210.177.xxx | 2009-12-02 09:00:33
I have to agree with jcemily, criminials are gonna get it no matter what. And it isn't fair to the honest individual!
Greg Brady - Options   | 198.51.216.xxx | 2009-12-02 12:44:46
I work in St. louis so I was in a Walgreens this morning. There are hundreds of options to pseudoephedrine based drugs out there. I've found something else that will work, but maybe there are case where only pseudoephedrine will work. I don't think the ordinance would have overburdened anyone but the meth makers.
anglicane   | 72.186.212.xxx | 2009-12-02 21:32:49
Let's see. I'll give you my sudafed when you take it from my cold, dead hands. When sudafed is outlawed, only outlaws will have sudafed. Sudafed doesn't kill people; people kill people. I'm sure there's a slogan in there somewhere.
Mom   | 75.121.88.xxx | 2009-12-03 16:35:25
When the archaic "sign this notebook" system for buying Sudafed was established, it was the perfect setup for failure.

Grellner chould have spent his time lobbying the state for a real database, one that pharmacists could access no matter what their location within the state, to hire additional personnel to monitor the database in each county.

If the pharmacists know or suspect that certain people are using multiple ID's, why are they selling the Sudafed to them?
Only registered users can write comments!

Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved.

Last Updated ( Wednesday, December 02 2009 )
 
< Prev   Next >

Latest Comments

Most Comments

Advertisement
 

Login Form






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Registration requires email verification. Check your inbox for mail from register@sullivanjournal.com after you've filled out the registration form!

Subscribe

Local Business Directory

Add Entry
Search